Asia has been witnessing a credit
boom of its own (nominal credit growth to nominal GDP growth >2x in HK, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore) with substantial part of the flows going into real estate with
economies like Singapore, Indonesia, China and Thailand enacting measures to
cool-off the real estate bubble. Of these economies, Singapore, Malaysia and
Thailand have household debt to GDP in excess of 70% which could imply
significant pain when interest rates rise. The low interest regime has created
substantial interest in real assets.
In India, we have witnessed
extremely strong housing credit growth where retail home loans are up over 10x
in the last decade and developer loans by banks / HFCs are up >15x. This
developer funding has been further supplemented by PE funds, capital markets and
informal financing markets. Of the retail home loan growth, 70% of the growth
has come from increase in ticket size of the loans, indicating the
preponderance of price growth in the market.
Stretched affordability indices
as a consequence have meant significant slowdown in absorption rates of
apartments. IT sector which contributed most of the absorption through their
massive white collar job creation have seen a decline in hiring levels and wage
increases.
High housing prices have created
their own cost on the economy in terms of knock-on effects on pricing of goods
and services i.e. the local fruit seller charges higher as his shop rental and
cost of living has gone up, cost of starting a business moves higher, malls
suffer due to high rental costs.
Raghuram Rajan in his book Fault
Lines wrote, “Easy housing credit has large, positive, immediate and widely
distributed benefits, whereas all the costs lie in the future. It has a pay-off
structure that is precisely the one desired by politicians, which is why so
many countries have succumbed to its lure. It pushes up house prices, making
households feel wealthier and allows them to finance more consumption.”
So question is will he act to
address the issue as politicians given their interest will not. His first act
at targeting consumer inflation is a step in the right direction.
The next question is what got us
to the current state of affairs.
Indian RE prices expanded
significantly in the post 2006 as the economic expansion resulted in massive
increase in costs (i.e. cement prices) and second a belief in long-term
prospects attracted massive dosage of capital. This capital was used to
purchase land at higher and higher prices. The collapse of 2008-2009 was
short-lived as government and the central bank coordinated a stimulus. This was
helped by record low interest rates globally.
This stimulus ensured that no
adjustment happened plus a short correction resulted in re-affirmation of the
investor belief of continued price increases. Private financiers (many times
with money diverted from their core businesses) poured in money into the market
lured by the returns promised by the builders. Banks which have traditionally
viewed real estate as the safest form of collateral kept financing the
collateral at higher valuations forming a virtuous cycle. Lack of real returns
in stocks and bank deposits and low cost of money for NRI’s ensured continued
interest in the RE assets. Corruption proceeds during the last decade as their
scale grew larger played their role.
With yields on residential
property at record low of 2-3% (compared to lending rate of ~11%) and urban
India with slowing incomes and high inflation, the final buyer has balked,
investors no longer believe that they can make 20-25% returns from these price
levels, banks are hurting with NPAs with no longer have the flexibility of
expanding their belief in prices.
This will create an impact on not
only consumption levels (consumer wealth) but also house building activity
impacting GDP growth further. The central and state budgets have no room to be
counter-cyclical measures and increasing interest rates globally will create
pressure on the Reserve Bank to maintain spreads high enough to ensure no
significant pressure on the rupee. It is likely, given the market structure
where stressed asset disposals are not easy and banks do not want aggressive
write-offs, we will see a combination of price correction and time discounting.
The retort we see from developers
of input cost going up does not hold, even for basic agricultural commodities
it is demand-supply model of price determination. It almost seems like a wish
to hold on till one reaches the cliff.
No comments:
Post a Comment